Mobile App Company: Creating Mobile Applications


We are a mobile application company that develops software solutions specifically for mobile devices, gaining experience in the IT industry for at least the last eight years.

Our company also provides IT consulting services to customers worldwide.

Mobile Development


Over the past three years, smartphone spending has grown 78%, providing software companies with jobs. The demand for mobile software has dramatically increased the way people create new ways of doing things. Today, one can attempt to design an application without coding skills and help software companies simply use DIY platforms or create them using cross-platform frameworks and network technologies. But only those with knowledge of native tools will provide a flawless user experience and make the most of your device's capabilities.

Native, cross-platform and hybrid

Mobile software is becoming increasingly integrated into every aspect of our lives and work, helping us to buy, play, get the latest news, connect with people and do many other things with our clicks. This penetration in everyday life increases the importance and diversity of iOS and Android native programming. Software development opportunities have also increased diversity, so that software design houses can provide various ways to create mobile software. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, so let's compare.


Native mobile apps


Software companies think that developing native apps is the best way to make mobile devices powerful and offer a user-friendly experience. Because these programs are written in the native programming language using the platform manufacturer's SDK, more than two encodings are required if software companies are forced to build a solution for both operating systems.

Therefore, native apps for the iOS platform should be written in the Objective-C or Swift programming language, Android operating systems require Java programming, and Windows Phone platform apps must be coded in C #, Visual Basic, and XAML.


Why is the native mobile application the best choice?

Native programs provide full access to device and operating system resources. Demanding that app companies build native apps will be able to integrate any of the features you find in other mobile apps.

These programs take advantage of advanced features such as access to USB inputs, camera, audio, memory management, sophisticated networks and more. They are fast, have no performance limitations and are for dense graphics or millions of active users.

Device manufacturers recommend the use of these technologies, as long as they allow development companies to create updated, updated user interfaces with operating system updates. A single, error-free, user-friendly interface can only be created using native tools.

Disadvantages of native development

No matter how well a mobile app company is qualified, it can not create such product for all operating systems with just one code. To support multiple devices with different platforms, developers must pass two or more separate programs during development. The code can not be shared between these programs, and it takes more time to become public. Application companies need to test multiple code bases before they begin. And, as long as you need more time, the costs may be higher.

Cross Platform Application


Is the cross-platform application better than native?

Since cross-platform apps have a user interface that is close to local and shared code bases, only the native snippets programmed, cross-platform development seems to be a better choice than native code. But it's not as simple as it sounds. Although cross-platform apps share code, the numbers vary widely, depending on the level of customization and the set of features required. Development companies still need to write additional code, the more practical the program and more code should be written for each platform. As the intermediate language continues to be explained as a core, the speed of the program can be slowed down. The platform's access capability and capabilities also depend on the structure and support of plugins selected to limit programmer capability. In addition, if your program requires a heavy user interface, the amount of code that is shared can add significant development time and miss the key benefits, time, and cost of cross-platform development.

An alternative to software development proposed by many IT companies is to use cross-platform structures such as Xamarin, Appcelerator and React Native. Because cross-platform frameworks allow to write almost-native programs in an intermediate language (such as JavaScript or C #), you can share up to 80% of most code between the platforms you need. What makes the mobile app look and run close to the native is access to platform-specific APIs and libraries.

Hybrid Mobile Applications

Unlike cross-platform apps, hybrid apps rely solely on HTML5, CSS3 and JavaScript Web programming languages. They use an embedded Web browser to render the UI using a code base. Device features are accessible through third-party APIs and plug-ins. Less customization and a single code base make them faster to enter the market than other cross-platform and native apps. The most famous hybrid development framework used in our development company is Cordoba, also known as PhoneGap. Other frameworks that can be used for this development include Trigger.IO, Telerik Platform, and Ionic Framework.

Mobile-optimized web-based apps


Mobile companies may also offer you another option to empower your employees to remotely access corporate data. There is no need to configure a local or cross-platform application to mobilize employees. Another option is to create a web application for smartphones and tablets. Unlike native, cross-hybrid, and hybrid apps, web apps can not be found in any digital store, but are easily accessible through a web browser and do not require storage space. This software is designed to be used on desktops and mobile devices for any screen size. It looks like an app on a small monitor that users interact with using the touch screen interface. The choice of software solution depends on your needs and how you and your employees will use it. Mobile software development will be the right choice if the primary goal is to attract users and stay on their mobile devices or provide offline access to content and features that do not require Internet connectivity. Web-based mobile optimization software can be a better choice for internal processes, communications, and data sharing.

Why the DIY platform can become a waste of money


Self-service platforms have become popular among entrepreneurs who have limited capabilities and no coding skills. If your goal is to create a simple promotional application that claims to be in the mobile market for you, you can try many DIY application manufacturers instead of hiring professional developers. Before you start using a DIY building site, let us provide what you should know.

What are the advantages of cooperation with the DIY website?


Easy to use. Even if you have never used this site before, it only takes 15 minutes to understand how it works. Those who want to build a product on this platform do not need coding skills. Each element has its visual representation. You can use templates that customize the template for your company image and add related content. In other words, you get what you see.

  • Unidirectional communication. One of the major challenges created by mobile software is communication challenges related to conceptual misunderstandings, response timeouts and other causes. Working with a DIY application builder, you do not have to wait for the developer or explain your needs and requirements.
  • Cost and time savings. Use your app to build your site to reduce development time by up to half an hour, so you get to the target audience as fast as possible. Development and maintenance will cost about $ 60 a month. At the same time, you will have multi-platform solutions for all major platforms.

Disadvantages of DIY platform


Limited capacity. DIY application manufacturers only provide basic functions, create a low availability and common remember each other's programs. It will not allow you to build a meaningful, powerful and simple mobile existence.

User experience Buggy. Even with a unique approach to each platform, developers face numerous challenges to create a flawless experience. DIY methods inadvertently discarded a lot of devices and users so that your app would not work on some smartphones and tablets. DIY manufacturers try to support all major operating systems with a single solution, but the platform is different, so one solution does not meet all the requirements.

Suspicious benefits. DIY manufacturers make publishing faster and cheaper, but the question is whether the product meets the needs of your business. Such a simple product will not differentiate you from your competitors, add value without engaging resources, generate real ROI and will be a close work program. In addition, this can significantly affect the reputation of your company's poor quality.